Hi :o) On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:14 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 23:02 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > --- karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, this seems somewhat similar to what we had > > > already : an index that > > > writers would add the content to, except that > > > currently we don't have > > > the actual index, but a new index that represents > > > how things should be > > > after reorganisation (at least that is the theory, I > > > suppose). > > > > Yeah... > > the Desktop User Guide is such a monster of a thing > > that it hurts my head to think of having two copies of > > it on the wiki AND cvs. > > (An aside to Shaun if he reads this: Project Mallard! > > we need to dice the monster up into topic-sized > > chunks!) > > Yelp infrastructure should be in place within the next > three months. Once the 2.16 docs are out, I'd like to > get any interested documentation writers to sit down > with me and actually write some documentation in the > new format, as we develop it. > > I think you'll find the format pleasantly simple, but > it will require you to think differently about content > organization. Fortunately (and unlike linear documents) > content really can be written before we've made all the > organizational decisions, and we can reorganize stuff > with little to no impact on content. > > It is coming. I promise.
Cool :) I must confess, I'm not sure exactly what this consists in, but the more I understand it the cooler it seems :) Does this replace docbook as <i>the format</i> ? If so, may we as well invest in working on the wiki, as online docbook editors may not be so useful ? Love, Karderio _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
