Hi :o) [cut, snip wazoo ; several people I reply to]
> > Karderio couldn't replicate the Ataxx bug on his own > > computer, and > > mentioned that it could be specific to my > > distribution. > > The Ataxx developer has added a note to the wiki page > to say that the bug has been fixed for the next > version. > Hooray for docs on the wiki! Cool, I'll start hacking on scripts to automate changing docs on the wiki somewhat. > I have noticed > > that the screenshot of Ataxx on the GNOME Live wiki > > (apparently added > > yesterday) shows at least one feature that isn't in > > the version that I > > used while writing the documentation. Should I get > > the latest version > > from cvs and update the documentation accordingly as > > I am rewriting it > > in docbook format? > > If you're comfortable compiling an app yourself, sure. > However, this is not something that's expected of > documentation writers (I've tried compiling, failed, > and given up). Hmm, the discussion about distributing fresh unstable builds seemed to fetter away last time I believe... Is somebody could give me a place on an FTP server to stick vmware images, I'd be happy to build GNOME every 2.odd.x release. I could put a page about downloading and installing these and vmware on the wiki also. I see this being built on Ubuntu, for ease and so they can get bug reports also. A better solution may be to use a distribution where you can choose *only* the components needed, such as gentoo or LFS, but I see this as being too time consuming... Conditional on getting Garnome to build however, I find it a bit of a pain... Love, Karderio _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
