Hi,

A related issue with distro specific documentation is the location of 
items on menus. Each distro will
in most cases customize where items appear on menus. And because of this 
customization vanilla gnome
documentation does not contain the correct distro specific location for 
these items resulting in the distro
having to manually fork the documentation, replace the menu location and 
ship the forked documentation.
Thus making it difficult to pass back upstream changes made to 
documentation.

I proposed a patch that would help alleviate at least this portion of 
forking by utilizing xml2po in gnome-doc-utils,
at build time for documentation to automatically replace the menu path 
within the documentation depending
on what the .desktop file contains.

Patch can be seen here :

    http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336185

cheers

Matt

Matthew East wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> To: Gnome doc lists
> Cc: Ubuntu Gnome maintainers, Ubuntu doc list
>
> I'm looking for some advice.
>
> In Ubuntu, during the last release we incorporated the Gnome user guide
> into the structure of our documentation. This has the advantage that we
> don't have to worry about recreating the wheel and can use the excellent
> material from upstream.
>
> The basic problem we are having though is that Ubuntu customises quite a
> lot of Gnome, and as a result the Gnome documentation is wrong, and we
> need to correct it. An example is the layout of the System menu, which
> in Ubuntu does not contain the screenshot/lockscreen buttons, but which
> are part of vanilla Gnome and therefore documented in the Gnome user guide.
>
> The two possible ways of correcting these are:
>
> 1. Creating patches on the Gnome documentation in the Ubuntu packages of
> gnome-user-docs.
> 2. Creating a separate tree with a copy of the Gnome documentation (to
> be updated from time to time) and shipping it separately in a new
> package, or with the Ubuntu-specific documentation.
>
> Both of these strike me as being quite difficult to maintain. I've never
> tried to maintain patches on documentation before but I bet it's pretty
> difficult.
>
> Read more about the problem here:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2007-June/008624.html
>
> I'd very much appreciate your advice.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-devel-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-devel-list
>   

_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list

Reply via email to