On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 22:39 +0100, Milo Casagrande wrote: > Hi, > > Il giorno dom, 11/01/2009 alle 14.41 -0600, Shaun McCance ha scritto: > > Do *NOT* set an initial status higher than "update". Only > > use "update" if the document seems to describe Gnome 2.24 > > reasonably well. If the document is referring to a bunch > > of stuff from 2.16 or something, or if it just never had > > the information it should have, mark it as "incomplete" > > or even "stub". > > > > If you have experience with DocBook and have committed to > > documentation in Gnome SVN before, you have my permission > > to commit initial status information to any document that > > is maintained by the GDP. Otherwise, just send an email > > to the list with a patch so we can make sure it's right. > > following up on what you wrote, I've edited a little bit Empathy's doc > adding the new status tracking. The updated document can be found in a > bug report [1], please take a look at it.
Awesome. You should also add a "planning" link in the releaseinfo to the planning page on live.gnome.org. Is there any reason you're not just working on this in Gnome SVN directly? I'm a big fan of Git, but having your latest work in SVN means Pulse can track it, and translators can start translating it. -- Shaun > > After that, get writing. Try to move through the status > > indicators. Your first goal is to get a complete document > > structure with technically correct information. Stay in > > touch with the mailing list, or ask question on the #docs > > channel on irc.gnome.org. > > I'll be back working on that document in the next days/weeks, updating > the basic new features of Empathy and going a little bit further > expanding it. Comments are more than welcome. > > Cheers. > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561033 _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
