Hello Milo,
> > Running automake --gnu ... > > gnome-doc-utils.make:74: if $(DOC_H_FILE: non-POSIX variable name > > gnome-doc-utils.make:74: (probably a GNU make extension) > > help/Makefile.am:1: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here > > gnome-doc-utils.make:77: if $(DOC_H_FILE: non-POSIX variable name > > gnome-doc-utils.make:77: (probably a GNU make extension) > > help/Makefile.am:1: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here > > > > Any idea on this? > Are you still having this problem? Is this a blocker thing or it > compiles anyway? It compiles. It just a set of warnings. You will notice them if you do an autogen.sh when building gbrainy from sources. > > I've been playing a little bit with gbrainy help to move it into a > more topic-base approach, splitting up some of your paragraphs into > smaller chunk of information and giving the document almost the same > structure as the GNOME Tetravex one I've been playing around. > > You can find the initial work here: > http://gitorious.org/gbrainy-help > > The topics there are not all written, I added them in order to see the > structure of the "entire" help, some others are missing, and the > entire help needs a good review. > > What do you think of a structure like that? If it's OK I can go on and > work on that a little bit more, and maybe complete the help (but > unlikely for the mid-January release). > > Let me know. For me is OK if you propose a new structure and rearrange the contents in a better way and extend the current documentation. Just one thing: please try to leverage as much as we can in my previous work when possible. There are already a few people that has translated the help[1] and there is at least 3 or 4 people more working on translations. Let me know your progress. Thanks Milo. Regards, Jordi, [1] http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gbrainy/
_______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
