On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 08:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:09 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:50 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:50 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > >> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:32 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > >> > > > Yeah, that is probably a good idea. Do we mention this in the docs > >> > > > anywhere else? (CC:ing docs list) > >> > > > >> > > On a few pages, I'm sure. Let me make sure I have the proposal > >> > > straight: > >> > > > >> > > * In 3.0, make Del do nothing, Ctrl+Del deletes (moves to trash). > >> > > Shift+Del would still be the keybinding for permanent delete? > >> > > > >> > > * In 3.2, Undo (Ctrl+Z?) will restore the file you just deleted. > >> > > It's just a quick shortcut, and the trash otherwise works as > >> > > it always has. > >> > > > >> > > Is that right? > >> > > >> > Yes, although undo is obviously more applicable than just for trash. > >> > >> Great. We'll deal with all the undo hotness next release > >> cycle then. > >> > >> As for Ctrl+Del, I agree it's better to make that kind of > >> change on a big point-oh release, when people expect things > >> to change. As long as we get notified of the commit, I can > >> make the docs changes pretty quickly. > >> > >> /me wonders how any technical writer can live without grep. > > > > I take this as an ack from the docs team. > > > > How about the release team acks? > > I'm fine with it, approval 1/2.
r-t approval 2 of 2. andre -- mailto:[email protected] | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
