Hello gnome folks.  Lately I've been getting set up to contribute code to
gedit; the "Get Involved" tab on gnome.org is very inviting!

But the actual process has been really painful.  That was surprising to me,
since I went out of my way to do things in as mainstream a way as possible.

Can we make the docs clearer?  Here's my best guess at what prospective new
developers need:

   - Distinguish between people who want to contribute patches and people
   who just need to build the binaries -- I think that building from the source
   tarball of the version of the apps I use on my system would actually be
   pretty easy.  But maintainers want patches against the top of trunk, and
   that's a much more involved process.  As a prospective contributor, that
   difference wasn't obvious to me; I assumed it'd be easy to compile the
   latest sources.
   - As far as I can tell, there are only two ways it's even possible to
   compile against the latest code: run an alpha distro, or use jhbuild.  The
   folks on IRC tell me that jhbuild is what everyone actually does, so we
   should find a way to point prospective developers at jhbuild early, before
   they start breaking their distros like I did.  (I even spent a day trying to
   figure out how to run an alpha distro in a VM)
   - Give end-to-end examples of a complete build from top-of-trunk.  I
   can't quite figure out why I had so much trouble compiling with jhbuild on
   my fresh Lucid install.  I think the developers either A: all went through
   similar pain fixing undocumented things, or B: are using some other distro
   that works really easily with jhbuild.  In both cases, we should get the
   prerequisites documented right.  In particular, it's tough for newer users
   to figure out what package to install when a ./configure bombs.

Here's the path I've taken for the last week trying to get things to build:

gnome.org -> "Get Involved" -> "GNOME Love Initiative" -> gedit -> "ah!
 it's in git"

search for "gnome git" -> live.gnome.org/Git ->
http://live.gnome.org/Git/Developers

That process actually worked pretty well -- I was able to download the
sources and we even submitted a simple patch to the "INSTALL" doc for gedit
mentioning how to do it.  Actually building it, though, gave me errors about
my libraries being too old.

That sent me down the wrong path completely: I downloaded about 3 different
distros of Ubuntu and Fedora 15 (per the recommendation on gnome.org),
trying to find one with sufficiently recent libraries to compile.  The alpha
release of Ubuntu Oneiric was actually new enough to get gedit to compile,
but so unstable that it left my machine unbootable.

Finally a friend mentioned IRC.  (BTW, a web interface like
http://webchat.freenode.net/ would have been really handy).  I asked there,
and people pointed me toward jhbuild.  jhbuild didn't work on my old Ubuntu
Hardy machine, so I installed a fresh copy of Lucid.

The jhbuild docs were pretty good, but I got funky errors about libraries
being out of date, which sent me back to IRC, where we eventually narrowed
it down to a bug in jhbuild, which I just filed.

Once I fixed that, it has been chugging away for a long time building a
bunch of dependencies like NetworkManager, which don't seem like they should
really be prerequisites for gedit, and occasionally failing when it needs me
to install a new system library.
_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list

Reply via email to