On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:01 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The current power panel settings have a few usability issues that it > > would be great to have fixed for 3.2. I have recently been working on > > a new design for these that could be implemented in the next couple of > > days (ie. before the string freeze). The relevant bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657916 > > > > The new design has been reviewed by several members of the design > > team. I've checked the user documentation and, from what I can tell, > > these changes will not have much impact there. > > The basic UI reshuffling will affect about a dozen pages. Maybe > a few more from the removal of what to do when the power and > sleep buttons are pressed, but that change already went in on > master (after the announcement period, without an announcement).
Well, holidays, plus Desktop Summit, plus presentation on behalf of the GNOME Foundation kind of eats into my maintainership time. > I'm a bit more concerned about this from the bug: > > Uses non-recommended terminology, such as 'sleep' (should be > 'suspend') and 'computer' (doesn't work for tablets)." > > We've been bouncing around on sleep/suspend in the help, mostly > because the UI bounces around. I'm happy to fix that if we've > decided suspend is the word. That's a few more pages. > > But "computer"? grep tells me 110 pages use that word. That's > just in gnome-help. Who decided that's not recommended? What > are we supposed to use instead? System? Device? Thingamajig? > And how are tablets not computers? FWIW, I think that computer is just fine. At least it's not something that I'd want to change _now_ for GNOME 3.2. _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
