On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 17:49, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:53 +0100, Phil Bull wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:50 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > Did people find the last one useful? It wasn't nearly as engaging
> > > as our in-person sprints. I don't really have a clear idea of what
> > > got accomplished.
> >
> > I'm sorry I couldn't be around for more of the last one. I managed to
> > get the eog docs fully reviewed and edited after a few days, but that's
> > all I'm afraid.
> >
> > > I think I could do Sep 24-25. It's crazy, and the translators will
> > > hate us.
>
juts a little, not that much
> But we're not getting gnome-help frozen this cycle anyway.
> >
> > Do we have a list of tasks which would ideally be accomplished by the
> > tarball deadline? I can hopefully work on some of those over the next
> > few days. And why aren't we freezing gnome-help?
>
> Not freezing because it's not ready. There are 238 pages that are
> completely unreviewed for 3.2. Every page needs to be reviewed for
> technical accuracy, because software changes could affect any one
> of them.
>
Would it be possible to flag the pages with their maturity level?
In such a way that it appears in the .po files.
So the translators would know what pages to focus on.
Something like
- stub (dummy text)
- draft (major change expected)
- under rework (some changes expected)
- under review (little changes expected)
- final
I am thinking it could also appear on the rendered pages (maybe as a build
time option), which would be fair play with the reader. And since it is
public collaborative work, under-final flagged pages could link to a page
explaining how to contribute.
[This is a stub. You can <link>contribute</link>!]
>
> There were pretty big changes in System Settings, including Online
> Accounts, Region and Language, Color (documented, could use review),
> Network (Proxy), Power, and Wacom Graphics Tablets. There might have
> been more. It needs review.
>
> The user menu changed, in particular the chat/notification status.
> Some notifications changed. We have a persistent notification for
> mounted devices. That may change how we tell people to interact
> with devices, in particular eject.
>
> Then there's Contacts. We might end up skipping it this cycle, but
> that will make the Online Accounts stuff very weird. "You can use
> these accounts for contacts. What's that? We're not telling you!"
> Then again, documents is mentioned in OA, and release-team said
> that Documents is a tech preview, and we shouldn't touch it.
>
> By the way, Online Accounts has a pretty big impact on the Empathy
> help, which is now tragically outdated.
>
> So, yeah, lots to do still.
>
> --
> Shaun
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
