On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:20 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Patches are on the bug report, feedback and comments appreciated. > > > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680983 > > > > > > > Any opinion on this? > > No 3.7 tarball of nautilus-sendto has been released yet, and I'm planning > > to release nautilus 3.7.92 later today, so there would still potentially be > > time for the change to be included in this release. > > > > Even if I didn't spell it explicitly in my previous message, the change > > implies an UI freeze break request for nautilus-sendto, and a string freeze > > break request for nautilus. > > I'd prefer to remove nautilus-sendto from 3.8; it's in my opinion way > too late in the schedule to get those changes in and appropriately > tested.
Those changes are based on the existing nautilus-sendto code, they're nicely separated, and they've been better tested than nautilus-sendto had the chance to be in the past couple of releases. > Still, I'd let this slip in, be tested in .92, translated, and removed > from 3.8.0 if necessary. Cool. FWIW, the only string changes are the 2 strings in nautilus, there's nothing more to translate in nautilus-sendto itself. _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
