Meooow (with a slight "rooar" in there), On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 16:06 +0530, Sindhu S wrote: > Quack! > > If we tried to make a Bugzilla query for documentation components easier > > (ignoring the "documentation" keyword), a first step might be to reduce > > the number of different names for the same component. > > > > Below is a quick and dirty list. > > - need to remove those projects where GNOME documentation team does > > not maintain the documentation instead of the project developers > > (sounds like a candidate for quick Etherpad editing at Hackfest) > > > > I did a similar one for projects.gnome.org to round up those git > repositories > which haven't seen a commit in 2 years/generally not being actively > maintained. > [1].
Meh. And now http://projects.gnome.org/ redirects to https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps ... One year ago one third of the projects in GNOME Git had not seen any code activity for the last two years. > If a project does not use yelp-tools and is not a GNOME 3 app yet then what > is > the resolution? Resolution to which problem? :) I'm not sure if we talk about the same thing - Personally I don't have problems with non-GNOME3 apps and their documentation so far. :P > Should we consult the maintainers to see if they are going > to > port to GNOME3 and thus are willing to use yelp-tools? For example: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698497 Ah, development related. Alright, I'm out, I'm a user docs and Bugzilla guy. :) > > - need to remove projects which are dead / unmaintained because we > > don't care (I might have a script somewhere left for that I think) > > > > Wouldn't this make bugzilla out of sync with projects.gnome.org or even > git.gnome.org? Say if the project doesn't exist on bugzilla.gnome.org but > its > source is available on git.gnome.org. Remove from the list that I pasted below in my email that the documentation team could use as a base. I did not mean to remove any projects from Bugzilla. I am sorry for any confusion. > +1 and auto create these for new projects on bugzilla on behalf of > maintainers/ > developers? Automatically creating won't be easy, but it could be added to the guidelines for Bugzilla admins at https://wiki.gnome.org/BugzillaMaintainers/CreatingNewProducts (after finding some agreement on what to actually propose here). Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | [email protected] http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
