Hi Andre, On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 02:02 +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> While we await the second ack from release-team, I was hoping >> I can ask for another break: > > Please always start a separate thread for a separate request in case you > expect me to understand, follow, and even reply to your mail. > In exchange and as a sign of appreciation I might try to avoid dropping > 15 entirely different bugs in a single Bugzilla ticket about Boxes.
Aye aye, sir! >> Put wizard & properties in a dialog - >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733367 > > Small comment about the patches: I'm not totally happy with the line > "// This file is part of GNOME Boxes. License: LGPLv2+" > in the attached patches, but it's not worse than before. IANAL, but IMHO > every source file should have a proper header with a copyright and > license notice. That is nothing new. Thats the convention we have always followed in Boxes. I tend to follow the general conventions unless I have a good reason not to so this is not coming from me. Marc-Andre started the project and he made this decision. Feel free to file a bug about this and we can certainly think about changing that for all source files. > (If .vala files are considered source files.) What else should they be considered? >> Designers would love to have this and so would I and Lasse in 3.14 >> already. > > Same opinion as Fred: *If* designers have tested this and would like to > see it, here is another r-t approval. As I said, they have not tested this but they do want it. Putting Jakub and Allan in CC to give their opinions. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
