Hi, On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 22:26 +0100, David King wrote: > On 2014-09-04 11:28, Mayuresh Nirhali <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8/22/2014 1:49 AM, David King wrote: > >>> A relicense to CC-BY-SA 3.0 (or a dual license, which would have the > >>> same effect) would be appreciated. > >> Yes, We would like to take this forward and close it soon. > > Sounds great! Thanks for your efforts on this.
[DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer.] *If* the copyright owners were reluctant to move away from GFDL, another option could be to relicense the content from GFDL 1.1 to GFDL 1.3 && CC-BY-SA 3.0 (dual-licensed), as far as my understanding of license compatibility goes. andre -- Andre Klapper | [email protected] http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
