On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:43:59 +0100 Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > If I interpret that correctly: If the videos received more maintenance > > there'd be no reason to potentially remove them, but there's no problem > > with having those videos (size, content, etc) per se. > > As far as I'm aware, the videos are being actively maintained. The > issue is the amount of work involved in doing that. > > >> And as time goes on, getting started isn't as important as it used to > >> be. > > > > Could you explain what data this statement is based on? > > Testing with new users? Something else? > > We're assuming that getting started was primarily intended to help > existing GNOME users migrate to GNOME 3, and that the majority will > have done so. What about users migrating from other environments and systems? Are we no longer interested in providing them with a good getting started experience? > But I'll reiterate what I said previously - I don't think that the > switch from video to static images is a significant downgrade. I don't see static images as a good replacement for videos. You'll be having hard time trying to explain some concepts without the help of animation. Cheers, pk _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
