On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:11:32AM +0700, Ross Golder wrote: > On ???., 2005-09-16 at 18:03 +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Maybe we should look into providing alternative status pages until > > > Carlos responds. Anyone with a strong machine with a lot of unused > > > CPU cycles on a fat-pipe willing to donate a couple of hours of > > > runtime a day for our l10n-status pages? > > > > We could do that, at klid.dk. We did provide some alternate status for > > gnome-i18n some years ago, so we have some idea of what is involved. > > We have a 100 Mbit connection and quite some spare CPU cycles. Anyway > > we would like to have it running in the night and niced. Please mail me > > with info on how to proceed. > > Sounds good. Perhaps we should arrange for 'status.gnome.org' to point > to the machine that hosts these pages.
Hmm, I thought you had another offer. Anyway, I am still willing to help. Best regards keld _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
