On ศ., 2005-10-07 at 20:42 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:12 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > > > > - If it really is that intensive, it's not optimizable, we need it on a > > > gnome.org server, than container is probably the most appropriate > > > home: > > > > > > window: 2 gig ram, 72gig (raid 1) disk, load avg ~1 > > > container: 6 gig ram, 500gig (raid 5) disk, load avg ~0.2 > > > > Any machine with sufficient CPU power and low load will do. But, some > > amount of disk-bound work is still necessary, because we are anyway > > talking about working with/parsing full CVS code to find extractable > > strings, and then working on each PO file in turn. > > Basically, GNOME doesn't have a "spare machine" - all 4 of ours servers > perform important roles in public services.
A dedicated i18n machine wouldn't be such a bad request, seeing as the translation pages service seems to be held in a very high regard amongst the GTP team. I vaguely recall some big company asking us what server hardware we needed for GNOME project use (on the sysadmin list I think). I don't recall seeing a response or followup. Does else anyone remember? Does anyone know the outcome? -- Ross _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
