Hi Mathieu, On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:01 +0100, Mathieu Blondel wrote: > Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > > >Exactly. As Behdad said, fantasdic contains features that GNOME > >Dictionary does not have (and some that won't have, at least for the > >time being), so it's a good place to test and experiment; also, since > >GNOME Dictionary exposes its main engine and UI inside a shared library, > >which can easily be wrapped by any of the language bindings already > >wrapping any other GNOME library, part of the functionalities of the > >Dictionary might be used inside fantasdic. > > > > > > (with my hat of gnome-utils co-maintainer and gnome-dictionary author > > Ruby is not just a prototyping language. At least, at the performances > level, I don't see any reason why we should rewrite it in C. Python > applications are not rewritten in C.
I didn't imply that at all. The whole fantasdic project has its own merits, and for those alone it surely has been allowed to be added to GNOME CVS. > That said, I want GNOME Dictionary to continue to live too. But > Fantasdic in itself, as an application, has interesting features that > may interest some people. That's not just a place to experiment for > GNOME dictionary. Absolutely, that's not what I meant. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
