-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yavor Doganov wrote: > Hm, could you please explain the differences between these two > dialects/languages? I know some people from Crimea and when I > asked they told me that there's no difference at all. That was > loooong time ago, though. > Well, crh and tt are related languages (looking at ISO classification), or dialects, but they are not the same. They are mutually comprehensible, so in a sense they can be considered dialects, but extent of mutual comprehensibility also depends on what alphabet one uses, etc. In general, tt_TR would be using 2 more characters in comparison to crh, spelling is fairly frequently slightly different (though again mutually comprehensible), some suffixes are different between the 2, and vocabulary is different in some cases.
P.S. What you were probably told is that there is mutual comprehensibility, not that there is no difference. There'd even be less difference using Arabic alphabet in comparison to Latin alphabet, but that's a historical alphabet at this time. Thanks, Reşat. - -- My public GPG key is at: http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=476802195259949354 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE97mHBp3xEgSYgSoRAh7cAJ4kN+xt/E8l8qV7kvSTzzwcvYZscwCfTu8i 6W2nnrL3ETUIm6ow7rQdYf8= =QcBS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
