Uhh sure thing, but this means that GNOME 2.16 will have a hard dependency on gtkspell via Tomboy. Is this alright?
-Alex Vincent Untz wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Le dimanche 03 septembre 2006, à 12:44, Elijah Newren a écrit : >> On 9/2/06, Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This simple patch makes the gtkspell dependency optional, and removes >>> the enable spell-checking checkbox in the Prefrences depending on >>> gtkspell's availability. >>> >>> I could probably just commit this as it basically counts as a build fix, >>> but I thought I'd take the safe route since I'm new to all this. >>> Besides, it gives docs people a heads up. >> Yeah, sounds sane, and it does have a ui-change necessary to go with >> the build fix. So here's 1 of 2. I wonder if that should be 2 of 2, >> considering >> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-August/msg00159.html, >> but it's at least 1. :-) > > Well, I believe it's better to not commit this for 2.16.0, but commit it > just after the release. It won't get enough testing for the .0 release > and I'd like to see more people testing the patch. (It's more than a > build fix to me) > > But someone else might give a second approval :-) > > Thanks for working on the patch, Alex. If you don't get a second > approval, go ahead and commit it after you release the tarball for > 2.16.0. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
