On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Leonardo F. Fontenelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's better :) When a imported, GPL-ed translation needs one or two > adjustments in Rosetta (e.g. because of an Ubuntu patch, or upstream has > a translation bug), how will the resulting Ubuntu file be licensed?
I believe the same rules applies here again. If the work is done via Rosetta, only this change will be licensed under BSD (unfortunately I don't know how the final product is "packaged" with these different licenses yet). Since there's hardly any transfer from Rosetta back to upstream as far as translations (exception for a few instances when people manually export from Rosetta and merge back upstream), there's no "contamination". I'll post back when I find out more info. -- Og B. Maciel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Keys: D5CFC202 http://www.ogmaciel.com (en_US) http://blog.ogmaciel.com (pt_BR) _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
