Am Dienstag, den 03.08.2010, 09:07 -0400 schrieb Og Maciel: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > > What for? Coordinators are expected to be subscribed to this mailing > > list anyway... > > I feel that it will give us a good pulse for what teams are active and > which ones aren't. Besides, if we don't get a "RSVP" from a team > coordinator, we could then make it a point of reaching out to the team > and see if we can do anything to wake it up. Basically, I want to be > proactive.
I see, and I agree. On a related note to being "proactive", I blogged about my thoughts and ideas as I gave a talk at GUADEC about identifying teams in need: http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2010/08/02/identifying-teams-in-need/ Maybe some of it could be useful, e.g. contacting teams with a big loss according to http://l10n.gnome.org/releases/compare/ui/8-12-13-16/ (mk, dz, sq, si, ne, en_CA, cy, hr, fa, vi) and teams that have had a very low Git activity for the last two years (an, bal, bem, dv, ff, fur, gn, ha, km, ks, ky, nap, tg, yo, zh_trad, zu, en_AU, ha, kk, la, ug) to ask for their status and potential issues and reasons why activity is low, and if possible how to help them (e.g. in case of missing manpower contacting downstream teams). andre -- mailto:[email protected] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
