Hi! > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positive. > I think the main objective would be to support (a) auto-commit in GNOME > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on sysadmin side) and (b) > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked branch for modules not > hosted in GNOME infrastructure.
I personally think that it would simply disburden us from lots of development work we had to put into damned-lies. Not that damned-lies is a bad system, actually it is pretty good (thanks Claude!) but as we are the only ones using it we also have the sole responsibility. > Here are some steps we could follow to go further: > * Find a team of people to take the job > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?) > * Decide to switch (or not to switch) I have seen several people working on/with transifex on this list in the past. I hope they can give it a go. We need some kind of timeline though. We need to have everything setup and working latest on string-freeze day. And we also need an implememtation of our string-freeze-break-detection for transiflex at this point. Regards, Johannes _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
