Hi! Mario Blättermann <[email protected]>, Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:22:56 +0100:
> Am Sonntag, den 19.12.2010, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Jorge González González: > > Hi all, > > > > is there anything wrong with the bug buddy documentation? > > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/bug-buddy/master/help/es > > > There is no really documentation. In the Git tree I found a manpage > only, and a naked manpage without any other stuff (appropriate > Makefile.am and OMF file) cannot be parsed by the gnome-doc-utils. As > far as I know, some explanations for bug-buddy are in the Desktop User > Manual. > > Recently, there appeared some other manuals in the Damned Lies which > were also untranslatable yet. For gnome-pilot and genius I have added > g-d-u support immediately, and the meld manual shouldn't be translated > for the time being, after consulting the meld maintainer, because it is > outdated. A new build system for meld will be implemented anyway next > time, probably autotools or waf. > > Why appears the non-existent manual of bug-buddy in D-L? No idea... > Could be that Vertimus parses the Git content regularly. But there's > nothing which resembles a DocBook or Mallard hierarchy. And I remember, > in the last years a similar bug-buddy manual appeared several times in > D-L and disappeared again some time later from it, also with zero > translatable strings. A bug in the parser routines of Vertimus? I went ahead and adjusted the appropriate settings for meld and bug-buddy. >From the DL admin interface, it seems we can't keep documentation domain set for a particular module branch or branches, but since gnome-2-24 has been released long time ago and is officially unmaintained now, I think we can live without the old stats. Cheers, Petr Kovar _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
