Hi, Sorry for that, I though it was an old translation, but it's true we changed how we displayed those items in 3.16.
Should I revert and then ask for string exception? Or just ask for string exception now? Carlos Soriano ----- Original Message ----- | 2015-07-01 20:03 GMT+02:00 Debarshi Ray <[email protected]>: | > To be fair, this restores an old string and actually fixes what some | > might consider a regression in 3.16.x. It should be possible to somehow | > restore the old translations too. | > | | This particular string (every character matters!) was never used in | Nautilus (I've checked every version since 3.0). As you can see, it | caused a regression in translation coverage for every language: | | https://l10n.gnome.org/module/nautilus/#gnome-3-16 | | To make it worse, this string is very visible to the user. | | If you can restore the translations, then everything would be fine. | I'm skeptical, though - you'd need to take care of proper mnemonics, | capitalization etc, all of which vary greatly among languages. | | Please also note that string change fixing a regression has a very | high chance of getting a quick approval. Especially if you promise to | make a new release (let's say) a week from now, so translators have | time to update their translations and can count on getting it in the | next release. | | Best regards, | | -- | Piotr Drąg | http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ | _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
