On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:28 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto <georges.stavra...@gmail.com> wrote: > You should read it again, then.
I really shouldn’t. That is my point actually. A freeze request should clearly explain from the start what the benefits and risks are, so that we coordinators can make a well-informed decision. The easier you make it for us, the more likely we are to give you a quick approval. > The rename popover, that is introduced by > that merge request, will not be introduced if the merge request isn't merged. > Without the rename folder popover, users won't be able to rename folders > from GNOME Shell. Thank you, that is important information. Would the user have a fallback mechanism to do it in that case? As it is, the risk of not merging it doesn’t seem that high to me and we are getting late so I’m leaning towards not granting you the exception for 3.34, but approving for a merge right after 3.34 is out so we have time to translate it for 3.34.1. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
