On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:02:47AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 10:41:04AM +0700, Ross Golder wrote: > [..] > > > I can't imagine anything will go awry, but I'm copying in the bugzilla > > > dudes so they know who to harass if anything stops working around about > > > now. In fact, if they can confirm/deny whether the rest of the virtual > > > addresses are still relevant or not, and if not I'll remove them: > > > > > > -- begin cut'n'paste -- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the email address used for bugreports > > created by bug-buddy where the reporter doesn't have a > > bugzilla.gnome.org account. It shouldn't get any mail. > > > > I'll change this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], probably tomorrow. > > Done. This can be removed from the configuration or sent to /dev/null.
Isn't it better to use a valid black hole email message than an
invalid address?
Owen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
