Rock! Thanks very much to everyone. I'd fake a Dr. Seuss quote, but it is bugday and I'm busy. Thanks...
luis On 8/24/05, Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On พ., 2005-08-24 at 01:37 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > On 8/21/05, Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On ส., 2005-08-13 at 08:55 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > > > <snipping board since this is not a hardware problem.> > > > > > > > > On 03 Aug 2005 01:15:05 -0400, Jonathan Blandford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan Blandford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >I missed this -- do we actually need hardware for anoncvs? I'm > > > > > > >wondering if we can just turn on pserver on container or widget. > > > > > > >When > > > > > > >we first set up anoncvs, we had pretty poor bandwidth to the > > > > > > >gnome.org > > > > > > >machines and canvas was underpowered. Things have changed -- we > > > > > > >have > > > > > > >more than enough bandwidth and machine power now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Tomas, do you have any idea of how much anoncvs traffic we get? > > > > > > >Given > > > > > > >that container is pretty underutilized, should we look into doing > > > > > > >this? > > > > > > >It would have the added advantage of being current, and not > > > > > > >lagged. We > > > > > > >could also do it on window, which has a read-only mounting of > > > > > > >/cvs/gnome, which would make me feel a bit better about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you do turn on pserver, you might want to look at the patches > > > > > > that > > > > > > are being used on freedesktop.org so that the cvs pserver runs > > > > > > completely unprivileged (it essentially forces the '-R' option). > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes sure that anonymous sessions can never leave stale locks > > > > > > around and limits the possible damage when the next CVS > > > > > > vulnerability is > > > > > > discovered. > > > > > > > > > > Oh nice! I would also love to update container to RHEL4 and set up an > > > > > selinux security context here, though that's not going to happen for a > > > > > little bit. I'll try to track those patches down, though, and give > > > > > them > > > > > a look. > > > > > > > > > > We should get this going sooner rather than later. > > > > > > > > Any update or ETA on this? I realized this morning that many of the > > > > tinderboxes that are suddenly springing up are running off anoncvs, > > > > which (given the current lag) makes them much less useful, and is very > > > > frustrating for these folks when they have to wait quite a while for a > > > > fix they've gotten committed to go live. > > > > > > > > > > We set up a new anoncvs server earlier, which has no lag at all (works > > > from an NFS mount of /cvs/gnome). We're just waiting on a colo firewall > > > update then it should be ready for wider testing. More information to > > > follow... > > > > Awesome. thanks, Ross... (and whoever else has made this happen) > > Luis > > Done and dusted :) We're lagless from now. See here for more 'fo: > > http://live.gnome.org/AnonymousCVS > > -- > Ross > >
_______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
