Toni Willberg wrote: > Toni Willberg wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Could the author of the blogging scripts implement some safe guards >> into the scripts. There are several processes couple times per day >> trying to consume all our precious CPU power on window.gnome.org. :) > > > It seems that nobody really takes responsibility of blogs.gnome.org.. > > We (GNOME.org Sysadmin Team) have spotted couple of fatal errors in NB > scripts which causes nice busyloops and such..
I've done a few fixes to our NewsBruiser already, so I might be able to look at some of the issues. What busy loops in particular have you observed? > > NB also servers all images trough Python script, instead of letting > Apache server them directly off-disk. This has caused the load of > window.g.o to be around 40-70 for several hours today. I hacked NB to > nice itself to 10, this should help as first aid. Some people had lots > of images on their blogs today which causes lots of extra load on the > server due this feature of NB. One of the changes I made to NB was to make the attachment serving cache-friendly (send etags and handle conditional GETs). Maybe putting a reverse proxy in front might be the answer. James. _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
