Joe Shaw wrote: >Hi, > >On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 00:27 +0700, Ross Golder wrote: > > >>The only thing that I can see we will lose from the migration that we >>don't have with CVS is the Bonsai interface. Several people have >>suggested that Bonsai isn't really that important anyway, and that we >>worked perfectly well without it for a year or so before I >>semi-resurrected it. >> >> > >I use Bonsai quite a bit to read patches that go into modules I'm >interested in. However, with svn's atomic commits and ViewCVS it should >be a lot easier to do this. Can ViewCVS show diffs of full commits (not >just files) when using subversion? If so, Bonsai's utility is basically >zero and we should replace the Bonsai URLs in commit emails with ViewCVS >ones after the migration. > > ViewCVS also comes with a script that can be used to populate a bonsai style database with information about Subversion commits. This can be used together with the viewcvs query interface to provide the same features as Bonsai.
James. _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
