On ศ., 2006-02-24 at 19:04 -0800, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote: > Allow me to recommend support of [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a new policy, > grandfathering in the current usernames. >
We are already indebted to the (volunteer) members of the accounts team for the time they put in to handling the accounts requests queue. I don't think it's appropriate to expect them to have to start adding '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (vanity) aliases for every man and their dog that requests them. It would be a big waste of their valuable time, and I can't really see how it would benefit the project. -- Ross _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
