Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 14:12 +0100, Darren Kenny a écrit : > Guys, > > We (Sun) would really welcome a tinderbox... It certainly would help us > a huge amount in our work on JDS GNOME if we know that things build > straight out of the box, and be able to know when things suddenly stop > working too ;) Are you aware of this: http://jhbuild.bxlug.be. This is an attempt to have a distributed jhbuild for automated builds of GNOME versions. People run a slightly modified jhbuild on their machine, running whatever OS they want and data gets published on the web there. We talk daily about this for several weeks on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet. Someone already provides builds of GNOME 2.16 CVS on Solaris 11 Sparc...
> If there's anything you need from me please let me know and I'll see if > there's anything we can do to help out. > > Thanks, > > Darren. > > Karl Fischer wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:41 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > > > >> The best idea I've heard so far for the machine was as a Solaris > >> tinderbox machine. It might also be worthwhile considering using it as a > >> webserver, given how good it is in multi-threaded environments. > >> > >> Would a solaris tinderbox meet with the approval of you folks on the > >> gnome-packaging-list? > >> > > > > I second a tinderbox. > > > > Karl -- Jérôme Warnier FLOSS Consultant http://beeznest.net _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
