On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 20:04 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> Em Sáb, 2006-05-27 às 02:07 -0400, Jonathan Blandford escreveu:
> > Now that the olpc people have set up their new servers entirely, we have
> > label.gnome.org available for GNOME's use.
>
> Great news!
>
> > It is also running RHEL 4.
>
> Also very useful ;)
>
> > Unfortunately, it has a smaller
> > harddrive than the other machines (~30G).
>
> Not that the others (except for container) have huge disks anyway...
>
> > I was planning on using this machine for the new library.gnome.org.
>
> Great, but I think we can make some more imediate use of it. As for me,
> I vote for moving anoncvs as soon as possible, as it would help let
> window breathe a bit, and I have been having to babysit window far too
> much lately...
>
> And as we are getting rid of it once the migration to Subversion is done
> (after one month), it's not like we're going to keep it on label forever
> or have to move it again.
Is anoncvs really the problem? it should be pretty light in memory usage
and that's the only really important resource... the problematical
things a while ago were more the python web services (blogs, live)
Owen
_______________________________________________
Gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure