On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 23:20 -0500, Kurt von Finck wrote: > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:15:56 -0500 > Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 07:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:59:10PM -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:15 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:11:49AM -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > > > > Could someone please help? > > > > > > > > > > send a ping to the ticket > > > > > > > > Done. But I still don't see it at > > > > <http://www.gnome.org/rt3-stats/accounts.html>. > > > > > > Please compare the name of that with what you mailed it to. We just > > > use some standard reply for all RT tickets.. > > > > I'm not entirely clear on what you're saying here. As per my previous > > message, I sent mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on the same mail thread > > as the original ticket. Could you clarify what action I should be > > taking to help move this along? > > > > Reply to the original ticket receipt from RT that you received.
Okay; I didn't reply to the *original* receipt message; I replied to a subsequent reply to that message. Would this have made a difference? The message still included "[gnome.org #5966]" in the subject and went to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Regardless, I've now replied to the original message. And I've gotten a copy of that message back from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And I still don't see 5966 listed at <http://www.gnome.org/rt3-stats/accounts.html>. > Nothing > you send to GNOME's Request Tracker should require manual address field > entry. At no point in all of this did I do that. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
