On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Owen Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > * Do tags and branches look reasonable (check for both newer > cvs-era tags/branches; they were handled differently)
There's some strange CVS-era fuckery going on in gnome-games with branches. Tags appear to be okay. http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-games/branches/ vs. http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-games/refs/heads All of the missing branches appear to be things we don't want to keep anyway but it might be worth examining why they were omitted in case the script has a more general problem. These missing branches also way, way predate my involvement in Gnome so I'm afraid I have no idea what the practices were back then. _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
