2009/2/27 Vincent Untz <[email protected]>: > Le vendredi 27 février 2009, à 09:16 +0100, Santi Béjar a écrit : >> 2009/2/27 Vincent Untz <[email protected]>: >> [...] >> > >> > + migration of docs: we have quite a lot of docs using svn. Eg, if all >> > the stuff under http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner is not ready >> > to be migrated, that's bad. >> > [nearly blocker] >> >> These docs only need a direct conversion, so I thought it was more >> problematic to maintain a copy of these under GitMigration with the >> conversion than do it right before the conversion. It that's a problem >> I'll do it before. > > Nod. But do we have a list of all such docs on the wiki? Were they > evaluated? (ie, are they all trivial to update?) >
Fair enought. I've added a list to the GitMigration page. They are mostly trivial, and at the very least 6 should be converted in my opinion. But two of these even if they are "trivial" they should be proofread by others. Here it is the list: MaintainersCorner: trivial MaintainersCorner/Releasing: +/- trivial but local commit + tag + push + failure? ReleasePlanning/MakingARelease: trivial + proofread AccountPolicy: trivial + proofread NewSVNRepos: -> NewGitRepos: extra work Infrastructure: trivial Santi _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
