The meeting is the best place to discuss this, not the meeting request. John
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Claude Paroz <[email protected]> wrote: > Le mercredi 03 juin 2009 à 08:10 +0100, John Carr a écrit : >> I agree with Behdad here. > > Does this mean that this account won't be created or that we should have > a special commit hook to double-check that the file is a valid po file > (which is already checked by D-L, of course) ? > > Claude > >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Claude Paroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Le mercredi 03 juin 2009 à 00:16 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit : >> >> On 6/2/09, John Carr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > We toyed with Thursday but in order to make sure all the new sysadmin >> >> > team members can be present, we are going with Friday as below. >> >> > >> >> > Christian, sorry you cant make it. If theres anything you want >> >> > bringing up or to discuss, feel free to talk to me or bring it up on >> >> > the list. >> >> >> >> No problem. The only area where I would perhaps be able to add some >> >> input would probably be accounts anyway. >> >> I assume some meeting minutes or log will be available? >> > >> > I know you cannot discuss about all pending requests regarding accounts, >> > but the request #8372 to have a passwordless account for the l10n server >> > to autocommit translations from the Damned-Lies application is somewhat >> > critical for the i18n team. >> > If this is refused for security reasons, we might take another route, >> > but I'd like to know this as soon as possible. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Claude > > > _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
