On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Christian Rose wrote: > On 7/31/09, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyway, these files were last modified in Jan 4 2005. I could recreate > > them using information in LDAP (used by Mango, created from DOAP and > > l10n), but I do not see the point. If a maintainer needs to be > > contacted, use Bugzilla so everyone is informed. > > I think mail aliases are useful. Not everything is technically a bug > or a feature request and belongs in Bugzilla per se. > > Think of release engineering and a module ignoring a certain freeze -- > it may not be a bug in the module on its own, but the release team or
For releng, we have scripts to email everyone. > the docs team or i18n team needs to get in contact with the > maintainers. Often, they already have an e-mail report of the issue. > You could parse MAINTAINERS file or DOAP by hand for mail addresses to > include, but having a mail alias ready would be so much handier. I was thinking to have a site where this information is visible. Were you aware of the aliases? Meaning: is it important for you to get the outdated ones back, or you want it in some time in the future? -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
