I would just bzip2 them that should at least clear up some of the space at
least temporarily.

sri

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Owen Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, planet.gnome.org has been broken today because we were out of disk
> space on gnome.org.
>
> Looking at disk usage, out 64G or so of total space on the / partition,
> big users are:
>
>  22G /usr/local/www/gnomeweb/
>  17G /usr/local/www/library-web
>  11G /var/log
>
> Biggest culprits for log usage are:
>
>  2.0G /var/log/httpd/art.gnome.org/access_log
>  3.6G /var/log/httpd/art.gnome.org/error_log
>
> The error log is full of errors and warnings that hopefully can be
> cleaned up?
>
> But I concentrated on /usr/local/www/gnomeweb/ -
>
> Two obvious places where space could be freed up:
>
> 1) The old devel-docs setup (build scripts that build a lot of the
>   GNOME stack from CVS to create tarballs of the devel docs)
>
>   In /usr/local/www/gnomeweb/devel-docs
>
>   I removed: cvs-2.0/ pserver-cvs-2.0/ install-2.0/
>   freeing up 3G, I left the gtk262/ tarballs-2.0/ directories.
>
> 2) The working directories for automated checkouts from svn
>
>   /usr/local/www/gnomeweb/svn-wd
>
>   Removed entirely. freeing up 3.4G
>
> That gets us out of immediate critical mode and we now have about 10%
> of space (6.4GB) free. Would appreciate help:
>
>  - Fixing the art.gnome.org logs
>
>  - Identifying more stuff under /usr/local/www/gnomeweb that can be
>   removed.
>
>  - Is there anything obvious to do to reduce disk space for
>   library.gnome.org? (If there's 17G of stuff there there is 17G of
>   stuff there and that's not that much disk space these days, but if
>   there's just waste, would be nice to clean it up.)
>
> - Owen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-infrastructure mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

Reply via email to