Follow-up: I re-applied using a different username, given the following
further feedback on IRC:

        <mneptok>       Firefox can't find the server at www.knocte.com.
        <mneptok>       http://mneptok.com
        <knocte>        mneptok: ??
        <knocte>        mneptok: do you mean I could get that username if I had 
the
domain?
        <mneptok>       i'm "mneptok" on IRC, IM, Skype, and every host i use 
ecept
GNOME. i had to use initials here.
        <mneptok>       ;)
        <mneptok>       if i cannot use :mneptok" then you cannot use "knocte" 
:)
        <knocte>        mneptok: right, that's why I'm advocating to at least 
use my
lastname, not some weird incarnation
        <knocte>        you at least could use your initials
        <knocte>        but my initials? aa ?
        <bkor>  not easily connectable to your name
        <bkor>  this is in the FAQ
        <mneptok>       i think the question WRT to last name only is "what do 
we do
when someone wants 'smith'?"
        <knocte>        bkor: exactly, this is why I want my lastname
        <knocte>        but smith is not MAX_LENGTH
        <knocte>        my problem is that my lastname doesn't allow more 
letters for
my name
        <knocte>        it's a special case
        <bkor>  happens more often
        <bkor>  anyway, have you tried putting in the 1st letter of your name +
lastname?
        <mneptok>       there is no MIN_LENGTH, so "smith" would be valid. and
confusing. and setting a "last name only" precedent would make the
argument against "smith" more difficult.
        <knocte>        bkor: aaragonese ?
        <bkor>  knocte: if a is your first name, yes
        <knocte>        mneptok: my point is that one cannot advocate a
"lastname-only" username with "Smith" because len (Smith) != 10
        <knocte>        bkor: sorry but that username sounds ridiculous
        <bkor>  ok, so I guess we have come to a conclusion now
        <mneptok>       knocte: there is no MIN_LENGTH
        <knocte>        mneptok: sorry but I don't think you understand me. 
Smith can
be preceded by letters, my lastname not
        <mneptok>       knocte: "last name only" is not a precedent i am 
willing to set.
        <bkor>  mneptok: mango allows more characters than official policy
        <bkor>  just to avoid discussions
        <bkor>  official is less, then we allow more
        <mneptok>       so aaragoneses would work
        <bkor>  yes
        <mneptok>       so there it is.
        <knocte>        ok, re-applying
        <knocte>        thx


El 15/03/10 20:49, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" escribió:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> May I request a bit of help here? In IRC, mneptok advised me to write to
> this e-mail account about my problem registering my new Git account with
> Mango.
> 
> Please see below the conversation for more information. Thanks in advance.
> 
>       <knocte>        hello, I think mango ( 
> https://mango.gnome.org/new_account.php
> ) is not working for me, anyone who could help?
>       <mneptok>       could you be more specific than "not working?"
>       <knocte>        mneptok: yes, when I submit the form the word UserName 
> is
> highlighted in red, and I see a text at the top that says "Note: Please
> read the following page first: http://live.gnome.org/NewAccounts.";, yet
> it doesn't tell me what's wrong with the username, and I've already read
> that page
>       <mneptok>       what are you putting as a username?
>       <knocte>        I guess that the form validation code is wrong, it may 
> be
> refusing usernames with length == 10, when the rule is to be 10 as
> maximum, so > 10 should be the forbidden
>       <knocte>        my lastname: aragoneses
>       <mneptok>       no diacriticals?
>       <knocte>        mneptok: no
>       <knocte>        I'm trying to look at mango's sources but I don't find 
> the
> line where it validates the username.. :/
>       <mneptok>       knocte: do you have an existing GNOME account for
> CVS/SVN/git, an e-mail alias, etc?
>       <knocte>        mneptok: I guess not, but I have the impression that my
> patches have been committed by the maintainers using the "knocte"
> username, can you check if that's relevant?
>       <knocte>        my email is knocte at gmail dot com
>       <mneptok>       i think what is causing it then is the use of the last 
> name
> alone. we prefer something more uniquely identifiable.
>       <knocte>        thing is, my lastname is already the maximum number of 
> characters
>       <knocte>        when I worked for novell, my username in the mono repo 
> was
> "aaragoneses"
>       <knocte>        but that is 11
>       <knocte>        and that is way too ugly (two 'a' at the beginning)
>       <mneptok>       right, so maybe "aaragon" or something?
>       <knocte>        huh, I don't know
>       <knocte>        is it really a problem to just have aragoneses? it's a 
> pretty
> uncommon lastname
>       <mneptok>       not a call i'm willing to make on my own
>       <knocte>        (even in my country)
>       <knocte>        mneptok: who should we talk with then?
>       <mneptok>       knocte: gnome-infrastructure@
>       <mneptok>       knocte: but i'm not really sure this rises to the level 
> of
> needing the sysadmin team to review the request. is an alternate
> username really that big of an issue?
>       <knocte>        mneptok: I would definitely prefer to have less 
> different
> usernames in my head, it really helps also to be able to have your
> source code/patches identified by a single username to improve googability
>       <knocte>        if I cannot get "knocte" as my username, I want to 
> definitely
> try at least with my lastname

_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

Reply via email to