On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:08:12PM -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > If you want to improve the doap file check, see gitadmin-bin module. > > Better check is really welcome. > > Actually, the particular bit you quoted is caught by our DOAP file > check. I know this because git.gnome.org rejected my commit when I > was trying to fix the other problem. This problem must have been in > this file from before validate-doap checked for it.
Ah, yeah. I saw you fixing the <maintainer> stuff as well. > The problem I'm seeing and fixing is that people are putting multiple > foaf:Person objects inside a single maintainer property. That's not > valid RDF. > > Owen mentioned on d-d-l a way this could be checked: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-April/msg00121.html > A > Of course, we won't get a full RDF validity check without using a real > RDF library. (Blip uses Redland.) But this seems like a common enough > problem to have a special-case check for it. > > I'm not quite sure how to run validate-doap on my machine, and I'm > wary of committing changes that I can't test. Any pointers? It is pretty easy: cat some-doap-file.doap | ./validate-doap some-doap-file The argument to validate-doap can be anything actually. Just used in an error message. Not sure if you can commit to gitadmin-bin, likely you cannot. Just send the patch here (gnome-infrastructure) in case of errors. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
