That being said, I'm sure I could adapt if UNCONFIRMED went away. :-)
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sandy Armstrong <[email protected]> wrote: > Who's "we"? I use UNCONFIRMED vs NEW all the time in my modules. > > I know the gtk+ team doesn't make a distinction between the two, but I > wasn't aware of any GNOME-wide policy. > > Thanks, > Sandy > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Olav & infra, >> >> Given that we don't make the UNCONFIRMED vs NEW distinction in GNOME (AFAIK), >> can we just remove UNCONFIRMED? >> >> behdad >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [Bug 542087] Graphical glitches after "change scroll region" >> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:44:11 +0000 (UTC) >> From: vte (bugzilla.gnome.org) <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 >> vte | VteTerminal | 0.16.x >> >> --- Comment #10 from Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> 2010-07-30 >> 05:44:06 >> UTC --- >> Well, if that's reproduced why is it that after six months the bug is still >> "unconfirmed"? ;) >> >> -- >> Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >> You are on the CC list for the bug. >> You are watching the QA contact of the bug. >> You are watching the assignee of the bug. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnome-infrastructure mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure >> > _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
