On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:57:30PM -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Christer Edwards > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Team - > > > > I've had these new servers for a few weeks (my apologies for not > > getting them back out the door faster!). I think I've got them ready > > to go, I just wanted to throw out the basic install specs and see if > > anything wanted to be changed before we lost our physical access: > > > > R310 : > > hostname "orchid" > > Hmmmmm why not try to fit with the existing (and unofficial) naming > spec. I'm in favor of functional names (webapps, master, etc) or > sticking to the existing standards. Most (if not all) of the existing > stuff is made up of gtk widgets or function.
Servers are indeed named after widgets. It is documented somewhere on sysadmin.gnome.org. Just find a widget which somewhat resembles the purpose and use that. For VMs it generally doesn't make sense to use a widget. Better to give VMs a real name IMO. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
