Gregory, we have implemented nickserv/chanserv already [1], would you suggest implementing channel protection directly through them? would you personally prefer going for that kind of setup instead of having a GNOME Operators team running the various channels?
Patrick, thanks for bringing this in to the list! 2016-01-04 17:24 GMT+01:00 Gregory Leblanc <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk > <[email protected]> wrote: > [snip] >> >> We wanted to have an on-ML discussion about channel OPs for GIMPNet, since >> we've had >> some cases of spammers when the network-wide opers aren't around. > [snip] >> Another idea I can think of is to make it easier to find network OPs that >> are available. >> Maybe have them determine a schedule of when which is available and publish >> this? > > Might it not be better to implement nickserv/chanserv? They don't > need to be as aggressive as the ones on freenode, but their code is > probably robust and flexible enough for our use. > Greg > _______________________________________________ > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure -- Cheers, Andrea Debian Developer, Fedora / EPEL packager, GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator, GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary, GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
