Andrea Veri commented:

@bwyazel, the integration server is up and running at [1], a couple of comments 
from my side:

1. Has this solution been evaluated properly before being asked to be deployed? 
Asking as in the end the GUADEC team figured Open Event itself was missing some 
needed features and that led to setting up surveys.g.o
2. The Connfa tool does not support LDAP from what I see and that's a pain as 
users will have to register yet another account. In addition the software 
itself has seen no commits since the past 2-3 years as per the commit log
3. Please plan these kind of proposals in time for the GNOME Infrastructure 
Team to be able to handle it without rushing, what I'd love to see honestly and 
coming from an enterprise background is requesting new tools that have been 
tested and are verified to have all the features we really need, this should 
happen before the request is actually made (in addition, is the software 
maintained? is there a team supporting it in case of CVEs?)
4. We went from a single static website ($year.guadec.org) and regcfp to 3 
different tools this year for organizing GUADEC, that's not ideal as it takes 
in additional maintenance burden (OSCP helps with that but still)

We'll work on the web app tomorrow much likely.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/147#note_534809
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.

_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

Reply via email to