Andrea Veri commented: @aklapper we've been waiting for a clear policy on what's allowed to join GNOME and what not. After several discussions and planning, https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/333 was created in this regard. That said, there are cases where from a technology perspective (see `The evolution-etesync is in the same group as evolution-ews or evolution-mapi, from the Evolution(-data-server) point of view, thus it can use the same group as these use in the GNOME-land.` from previous comments) it's actually fine to just go ahead and process the namespace transfer without having to wait for the policy to be fully in shape. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/414#note_904632 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
_______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
