Em Sex, 2011-08-12 às 14:20 -0400, Mike Williams escreveu: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:49:49PM -0600, Dennis J Perkins > wrote: > > I agree. Too many things are missing. And why require > accelerated > > graphics? GNOME 3 seems to suffer from the attitude that > tablets are > > the future and desktops and laptops are passe. I've used > GNOME since > > the 90's but I'm trying alternatives to find which I like > best. > > > > The designers stated btw that tablets are not the focus, bad > input > devices is. > > > What do you mean? Bad input devices are the focus? What about a mouse > and a large screen because that is a problematic configuration with > gnome3 due to having to move all the way from one side to the other.? > > Mike
BAD input devices ?? you mean the keyboard??? For what I see, gnome3 works very good with the keyboard (alt this, alt that, control alt this, shift control alt that...) Well, have we return the the wordperfect times?? (in the 70's)?? Even if with mouse is not "so fast", but it is more intuitive... Indeed Ana, 3yo can operate gnome2 but not gnome3..
_______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
