On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 22:21 +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: > They are in my opinion also the same bug. Probably would have been > better to have added your proposal to #321567. Just suggest your user > interface improvement in that bug.
OK, should I make a new comment to that bug regarding the interface, even though my bug has been marked as a duplicate? > > Also do not put everything in one bug report. Using a different backend > should be another bug report. I didn't write about using a different backend in that bug. It only concerned the user interface... > > > > >>Furthermore it really helps if you already come with the patch. People > >>file zillions of requests and ideas. Maintainers and developers usually > >>don't go through bugzilla for looking what feature to implement next. > >>They usually implement what they find important or nice to do. > > > > > > I never asked the maintainer to implement it. In fact, I said I would be > > happy to work on it myself. What I asked for was directions/advice/etc. > > I wanted to start a discussion about it, because I'm unsure how to > > approach the problem. > > Sorry, I meant to say that if you submit a small patch with a small > improvement it is easier attention of the maintainer (they are usually > very busy and receive loads of bugmail). If you start submitting patches > maintainers start to know you and because of that it is also easier to > get directions/advice. Yes, I understand. Btw, if I change the glade interface of a program, should I submit a patch to the original glade file, or should I submit the complete glade interface? -- Johannes H. Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> deworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnome-love mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
