On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 23:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Jaap Haitsma wrote: > > > So my suggestion would be to simply use jhbuild, because that is the > > buildtool that everybody is using. Then we immediately also test if > > jhbuild is working OK. > > Yes, starting with jhbuild is certainly easier whenever the goal is > compiling GNOME. > > > > Setup could be very easy to start with: Just a simple cron script that > > does a "jhbuild tinderbox" at for example 12AM and 12PM and writes the > > output html pages to a webserver. > > > > What do the people from Brussels and others think about this? > > We can do much much more; at least I hope so :) See my kind of > announce as answer to Luis. Since then a few hours passed and there > is now enough account support to unleash something here. > > See http://jhbuild.bxlug.be/participate and don't hesitate to report > problems. > >
Great stuff you are doing :-) Some comments/suggestions 1. Why did you change the output format of the jhbuild logs? I prefer the standard logs of jhbuild (see e.g. attached log) as it only uses one line per module and because of the colors (green/red) and the one line per module you immediately can see what went well and what didn't. 2. Did you put your autobuild patch in bugzilla so it can get included in jhbuild CVS? Jaap _______________________________________________ gnome-love mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
