On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 07:32 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > <snip> > > I don't know what was the intention of Mark. But if Totem only > > requires GTK+ and GStreamer probably is good enough. > > I still have to read through the thread... > My intention is that I'm sometimes working on whaawmp, a gst & pygtk > using media player (although development is slow, > because we a short of time atm).
What's wrong with Totem in the first place? I'm pretty sure there's ways to make it leaner if that's the main complaint... > If I want a browser plugin, my only choise is to install a second > media player. This makes the first mediaplayer pointless. > So I just thought, making the plugin more generic would be a good > idea, even if it is, defining an api, that media players can provide > to extend it with compatibility stuff, playlists, whatever, something > that can be usefull to all mediaplayers that will be written (using > gst). > Something like that. I don't see how I could make the browser plugin code more generic... More generic than that and it would be the null plugin from Firefox... _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
