Il giorno mer, 13/12/2006 alle 15.35 +0000, Calum Benson ha scritto: > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:26 -0500, Rodney Dawes wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:30 +0000, Calum Benson wrote: > > > There's also the question of what happens if two applications want to > > > install HC icons with the same name (which may or may not look the > > > same). I guess we already have that problem with the hicolor theme, > > > though, and it probably just needs a 'best practice' guideline, if there > > > isn't one already. > > > > There can not be two executables in the same $bindir with the same > > name. Applications should not install icons to the system theme, that > > are not the application icon. > > Yep, my bad, I was thinking about the generic icons like > "accessories-calculator", an application icon that several different > calculator apps might feel they have a right to install. But actually > none of them should install it, I suppose.
About this, could you please take a look at * http://bugs.gnome.org/357413 (Revising Icon standard in EOG) * http://bugs.gnome.org/383348 (Update image-viewer to Tango style) The issue is: the application icon used by EOG is old-stylish, 'cause gnome-icon-theme provides "image-viewer" with outdated (non Tango) style and eog don't provide "eog" named icon. EOG maintainer prefers update the icon in g-i-t. The solution is: a) update "image-viewer" b) deprecate "image-viewer" and use "eog" ??? _______________________________________________ gnome-themes-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
